

by Sarah at ProgressiveKid
War, disease, economic devastation, and catastrophic geologic and climate events create refugees every day. According to the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants’ World Refugee Survey 2008, worldwide there are currently over 14 million. An additional 25 million people are displaced internally and so are not considered in refugee totals. In the Democratic Republic of Congo alone, the advances of Tutsi Rebels have displaced 200,000 people since August.
But those are just numbers. And they’re so big, it’s hard to understand what they even mean on a personal level, to the people who are refugees—and to the people who are not.
People Without a Place
To be a person without a place is to be
Your New Neighbors
The United States has promised to admit 17,000 Iraqi refugees next year, up from 12,000 this year. (This figure pales in comparison to the burden shouldered by Syria, Jordan, and other neighboring countries of Iraq, which have taken in 1.5 million Iraqis.) The Center for Immigration Studies reports that 1.6 million legal and illegal immigrants, many of whom are economic refugees, settle in the United States each year. The Center predicts that if immigration continues at current levels, the nation’s population will increase by 167 million (56 percent) by 2060, with immigrants and their descendants accounting for 63 percent of the increase. But immigration will not continue at current levels. Instead, as a result of climate change, it will most certainly increase as increasing refugee populations look for places to relocate.
What does it mean to be the host country of refugees? First there is an economic burden, as health care, education, and social service resources are increasingly tapped. Second there is the burden of social unrest caused when large numbers of desperate people suddenly pour into an area and begin to consume already scant resources.
Planet of Refugees?
Climate change will bring refugee status and the burden of refugee hosting to people in all parts of the world. The UN has warned that the numbers of refugees are again on the rise, and that climate change is creating a new type of refugee. Antonio Guterres, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees explains: “Climate change is today one of the main drivers of forced displacement, both directly through impact on environment—not allowing people to live any more in the areas where they were traditionally living—and as a trigger of extreme poverty and conflict.” The Christian Aid Agency predicts that there will be a total of one billion people displaced by climate change by 2050.
Where are all the displaced people going to go? You can be sure that refugees are coming to your neighborhood, if you remain lucky enough to still have one. And the refugees will not just be human. We will be seeing refugees of every species in search of hospitable places on earth, looking for food, looking for water, looking for shelter.
If climate change remains unchecked, we are all in danger of becoming refugees from Planet Earth. Except there is no other place to go.
Image by Tracy Hunter, Creative Commons license, 2007.
©2008 ProgressiveKid
You must be logged in to post a comment.
A quick couple of comments about your summary of the Sahrawi refugee camps around Tindouf, Algeria. The figure of 90,000 is not the total number of refugees, but the figure that was used a couple of years ago by the World Food Programme for people “at risk” of hunger. Previously the WFP had estimated those at risk at around 153,000. Some have argued that this downgrading was politically motivated, with the WFP responding to pressure from donors who wanted to exert pressure on the Polisario independence movement to accept Morocco’s offer of limited autonomy (but which precludes the UN mandated referendum on self-determination).
As for the allegations of slavery, these are highly suspect, based on claims made by an Australian journalist who visited the camps and had some trouble with the Polisario. Original claims that she interviewed a slave subsequently became claims of “thousands” of slaves being abused in the camps. These claims have been widely propagated by Morocco and its allies, who have a vested interest in discrediting Polisario - both maintain competing claims to Western Sahara. Those who have spent time in the camps (including myself) dismiss the slavery claims as propaganda. While slavery existed in Western Sahara in the past, and still exists in neighbouring Mauritania, Polisario formally banned it in the early days of the independence struggle. Whatever the situation in the camps (and the legacy of slavery may linger in terms of social inequality and exploitative relationships), claims of institutional slavery and thousands of people living as slaves are extremely suspect, and are based more on propaganda than any evidence. One has to be extremely careful when assessing what is going on in Western Sahara and the camps due to the very nasty propaganda campaign that is being waged predominantly - it has to be said - by Morocco. Don’t take anything you hear at face value - even from me. Instead, dig around for information from sources that are as impartial as possible - international agencies, human rights organisations, and so on.
More from me on this at http://nickbrooks.wordpress.com. Also on the excellent “One hump or two” and “Western Sahara Info” blogs.
Thanks, Nick, for your comment, especially the part about the numbers of people in the Sahrawi camps.
I’m somewhat less appreciative of your little slap that one should “Dig around for information from sources that are as impartial as possible.” Of course! Please note (not that I’m feeling defensive or anything!):
1. My info. came from the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants.
2. These reports have been corroborated by respected newspapers such as El Pais from Spain and the Malian newspaper Lobe.
3. In October, Anja Oksalampi , the Secretary General of Yaakar Redhric Association, addressed the 4th Committee of the UN General Assembly to express her concern about the fate of the people held against their will in Tindouf, “the slaves of the Polisario Front.” I assume the UN does not allow such interruptions unless there is a certain amount of credibility to the speaker.
4. I intentionally did not claim there were “thousands” but used the vague “many,” because accurate statistics are not available.
I appreciate careful attention to detail and your dedication to ensuring that the truth about the camps be told.